LOGO
PL
“Journal of Ultrasonography” gets an IF!!

We are proud and pleased to announce that “Journal of Ultrasonography” has joined the elite group of periodicals with an Impact Factor (IF).

Our IF for 2024 is 1.5 (5-year IF – 1.5).

I want to extend my sincere thanks to the Members of the Scientific Committee, Section Editors, Authors, and Reviewers. This success is your success. The IF is a testament to your effort and hard work over many years. Without your invaluable contribution, we would not be in the place we are today.

We hope that in the coming years we will be able to consolidate our position – and even strengthen it ‒ by publishing even better papers with a greater citation potential. 

This will only be possible with your continued support, so we will greatly appreciate your unwavering commitment, good-quality publications, careful reviews, and plenty of citations (mainly articles from 2024 and more recent studies). All these elements are essential if we want to enjoy an even better IF score next year.

Happy and grateful in equal measure, we pledge to continue our hard work!.

Prof. Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska
Editor-in-Chief

Ultrasound in intensive care unit patients: applications, observations, and comparison of two established ultrasound methods

To evaluate the benefit of abdominal ultrasonography performed routinely and thus independently of symptomatology in patients in the intensive care unit, and to assess the value of a portable ultrasound device. Diagnostic yield and documented results with clinical consequences were considered and compared with findings obtained using a high-end ultrasound device.

André Ignee, Matthias Dusik, Daniel Wastl, Kathleen Moeller, Beatrice Hoffmann, Christoph Frank Dietrich
J Ultrason 2025; 25: 16
Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pediatric distal forearm fracture: a systematic review

Distal forearm fractures are one of the commonest injuries in children due to falling on an outstretched hand. Plain X-ray is the gold standard test for diagnosing fractures of long bones but it exposes patients to radiation with its associated health hazards.

Ayman S. Ahmed, Ahmed E. Abdelhady
J Ultrason 2024; 24: 19
Overview for developing Delphi-based interdisciplinary consensus statements on imaging: pros and cons

This review paper offers a concise guide on how to execute Delphi-based interdisciplinary consensus statements on imaging. Fundamental to the Delphi methodology are several core principles. First, an initial key element is the selection of experts, known as panelists. Second is the principle of anonymity among participants, ensuring that no single individual or group applies excessive influence over others. Third, the methodology involves iterative rounds where statements are presented repeatedly, allowing for controlled feedback. Lastly, after each round, participants are given insight into the collective panel’s previous responses. This knowledge enables them to potentially reconsider and adjust their positions in subsequent rounds, driving towards the group consensus. These principles emphasize the critical role of statistical group responses and the structured interaction inherent in the Delphi approach. Looking at the broader process, the development of Delphi-based interdisciplinary consensus statements on imaging unfolds through several stages. It begins with identifying the research field or the consensus statements in question. This is followed by undertaking comprehensive literature research. Subsequently, pertinent questions and their corresponding statements are crafted. The process then moves on to administering anonymous, iterative questionnaire rounds. Feedback, both on an individual and collective level, is provided between the rounds. The process culminates in the summarization and reporting of the finalized Delphi-based interdisciplinary consensus statements on imaging.

Tobias Johannes Dietrich, Vasco V. Mascarenhas, Luis Cerezal, P. Diana Afonso, Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska
J Ultrason 2024; 24: 15